As computational power has increased and simulations and testing have become more sophisticated,
it has become possible to make accurate predictions for more real-world systems. But as design
cycles tighten and problems become more complex, engineers and data scientists are challenged to
get the most out of their simulation capabilities. Engineers and data scientists are faced with
four major challenges in engineering simulation: how to put error bars on simulation results,
insufficient or inadequate sampling of a design space, high computational expense of
simulations, and disagreement of simulation models with physical tests. SmartUQ provides a
powerful and viable approach to meet these challenges.
Challenges in Engineering Simulation
Putting Error Bars on Simulation Results
Many simulation results are deterministic in nature and only show a single point for one possible
scenario. To consider the possible variability in the results, engineers and data scientists may
perform a direct Uncertainty Propagation to quantify the uncertainty. But this approach can be
computationally demanding if not impractical for many simulation models.
Insufficient or Inadequate Sampling of a Design Space
This has been a chronic problem for engineering simulation. Standard methods such as Monte Carlo
sampling and factorial designs are not effective or impractical at higher dimensions.
High Computational Expense of the Simulation Model
Computational costs make design exploration impractical for many complex, long running simulation
applications. Traditional design exploration techniques, such as random search, are
prohibitively expensive for high dimensional problems.
Disagreement of Simulation Model with Physical Testing
The goal of most simulation design processes is to create a model that mimics reality. This goal
is accomplished by comparing the simulation results to physical test results of the same system.
A crisis of confidence occurs when physical tests fail to validate predictions from simulation
models. Failing to do so forces re-design or re-testing that can be expensive and time
consuming.
SmartUQ’s Uncertainty Quantification
techniques put error bars on simulation results. By performing UQ techniques such as Uncertainty
Propagation and Sensitivity Analysis, decision makers can be better informed decision. By using
a SmartUQ emulator, it is possible to perform advanced analytics that require a large number of
predictions.
Verification and Validation (V&V) Under Quantified Uncertainty
It is often necessary to not only validate a simulation model’s deterministic solution for a
design but also to validate the predicted probability distribution resulting from system
uncertainty to ensure that the model accurately gauges the effects of system variability.
Validation of simulation models is critical in many applications, such as those found in the
aerospace, defense, and medical device industries, where expensive physical testing can be
avoided or significantly reduced by using validated models.
An emulator (aka, a predictive model) is a virtual representation of a system that can quickly
and accurately search the design space and perform advanced analytics. Implementing emulators
makes the process computationally less expensive and more adaptive in the long run, should new
designs be sought.
Statistical Calibration can reduce the disagreement between a simulation model and physical
testing results by performing tasks like:
Diagnosis of Model Inadequacy
Improving Simulation Accuracy
Prerequisite for Model Validation
The benefit of Statistical Calibration is to avoid costly mistakes early on and minimize the
number of physical tests.
Summary
SmartUQ’s analytics and Uncertainty Quantification tools such as DOEs, emulation, statistical
calibration, and inverse analysis can be powerful in meeting the many challenges posed in
simulations. Uncertainty Quantification can put error bars on simulation results and assess
maturity and credibility of simulation models. Modern DOEs reduce the number of simulation runs
required to explore a design space while emulation allows rapid optimization and uncertainty
analysis. Statistical calibration methods can understand of the difference between simulation
models
and physical tests and calibrate simulation models to better represent physical realities. As
the
importance and complexity of design cycles increases, SmartUQ software fills a critical gap in
simulation models.
If you have an analytics challenge with your engineering simulation, email us at [email protected].
This paper focuses on solutions to three major challenges in the CAE design processes and how statistical methods are a powerful and viable approach to meet these challenges.
This article discusses how SmartUQ uncertainty quantification and analytics platform allows simulation to overcome ambiguities for better informed decision making.
This webinar discusses why simulation results might not always be reliable, ways to calibrate simulation using test results, how to spot simulation anomalies and inaccurate results.
This webinar will introduce stochastic methods and UQ tools, discuss potential implementations in an industry setting, and use case studies to demonstrate the benefits of going beyond deterministic analysis.